Important information: this site is currently scheduled to go offline indefinitely by end of the year.
[req].vfs bms script?
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
The contents of this post was deleted because of possible forum rules violation.
-
Mr.Mouse
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: Dungeons of Doom
- Has thanked: 450 times
- Been thanked: 682 times
- Contact:
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
Well, I could not see it. The pieces of 1024K are too small. Try this and attach the debug.txt.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
it works on .vfs in patch file, not xxz.vfs.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Mr.Mouse
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: Dungeons of Doom
- Has thanked: 450 times
- Been thanked: 682 times
- Contact:
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
LOL.Found the bug, and it was a very STUPID one.
THis should fix the issue.
THis should fix the issue.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Mr.Mouse
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4073
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 6:45 pm
- Location: Dungeons of Doom
- Has thanked: 450 times
- Been thanked: 682 times
- Contact:
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
Good, now thank me by clicking the <thank post> button dammit! Do you realise the amount of work that has gone into deciphering this format and programming that tool? 
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
Mr.Mouse wrote:Good, now thank me by clicking the <thank post> button dammit! Do you realise the amount of work that has gone into deciphering this format and programming that tool?
I do. This tool is great.Re: [req].vfs bms script?
The contents of this post was deleted because of possible forum rules violation.
-
aluigi
- VVIP member
- Posts: 1916
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 12:26 pm
- Location: www.ZENHAX.com
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 664 times
- Contact:
Re: [req].vfs bms script?
uhmmm only for my personal curiosity:
wasn't more simple and easy to add the missing part for handling the folders tree in the bms script I posted?
it was already done at 95% :)
if the complete tree is not important I could add at least the handling of the last folder to avoid the problem of the files with the same name.
anyway was only a curiosity.
wasn't more simple and easy to add the missing part for handling the folders tree in the bms script I posted?
it was already done at 95% :)
if the complete tree is not important I could add at least the handling of the last folder to avoid the problem of the files with the same name.
anyway was only a curiosity.